The US Division of Justice has filed a lawsuit over Activision Blizzard’s “Aggressive Steadiness Tax” within the Overwatch and Name of Responsibility leagues that it says “penalized groups for paying esports gamers above a sure threshold and restricted participant compensation in these leagues.” On the identical time, the DOJ additionally submitted a proposed settlement that, if permitted by the court docket, will finish the matter so long as Activision guarantees to not do it once more.
The lawsuit (opens in new tab) notes that each Overwatch and Name of Responsibility are massively profitable video games, and that their respective professional leagues “have generated lots of of thousands and thousands of {dollars} for Activision from franchise charges, sponsorship revenues, unique streaming offers with YouTube, and the Overwatch League’s tv broadcast cope with Disney (together with subsidiaries ESPN and ABC).” Like most different sports activities leagues, the Overwatch and Name of Responsibility leagues are made up of independently owned groups, who’re in fixed competitors to signal and retain the very best gamers.
“From the inception of every league, Activision and the groups agreed to impose guidelines that had the aim and impact of considerably lessening competitors for gamers by suppressing participant compensation,” the lawsuit states. “Beneath these guidelines, which Activision known as the ‘Aggressive Steadiness Tax,’ groups have been fined if their complete participant compensation exceeded a threshold set by Activision annually. For each greenback a crew spent over that threshold, Activision would high quality the crew one greenback and distribute the collected sum professional rata to all non-offending groups within the league.”
This settlement had a couple of results, in keeping with the DOJ. It lowered the probability of costly bidding wars for gamers, and for groups that did spend massive for marquee gamers, it had the knock-on impact of driving down the salaries for everybody else. “Groups additionally understood that the Tax incentivized their opponents to restrict participant compensation in the identical means, additional exacerbating the Tax’s anticompetitive results,” the lawsuit states.
Sports activities followers studying this would possibly fairly marvel why Activision Blizzard is getting warmth for imposing a wage cap, which is frequent in different sports activities leagues: The NBA, WNBA, NFL, NHL, MLS, CFL, NLL, and varied others all have wage caps, as an example, and that is simply in North America. The explanation, like so many different Activision points, comes all the way down to a scarcity of correct illustration: Different professional leagues reached wage cap agreements by way of collective bargaining, however gamers within the Overwatch and Name of Responsibility leagues should not unionized, and the cap was imposed on them with out their enter or consent.
“Videogames and esports are among the many hottest and quickest rising types of leisure on the planet right this moment, {and professional} esports gamers—like all staff—deserve the advantages of competitors for his or her providers, Jonathan Kanter, assistant lawyer basic of the Justice Division’s Antitrust Division, stated in a press release (opens in new tab). “Activision’s conduct prevented that from taking place. In the present day’s lawsuit makes clear that the Antitrust Division stays dedicated to defending staff throughout all kinds of industries from anticompetitive conduct.”
Alongside the lawsuit, the Antitrust Division additionally filed a proposed consent decree—principally a settlement of the case—which might prohibit Activision from imposing any rule that both limits participant salaries or penalizes groups for throwing round an excessive amount of money. Activision additionally has to comply with remove the Aggressive Steadiness Tax in its esports leagues.
In a press release despatched to PC Gamer, Activision successfully agreed with the phrases of the settlement, though it denied that Aggressive Steadiness Tax broke any guidelines.
“Activision Blizzard Esports is dedicated to being a pacesetter within the esports trade and creating alternatives for gamers to earn truthful pay and advantages,” an organization consultant stated. “Once we launched The Overwatch and Name of Responsibility Leagues, we needed to create viable profession alternatives for the gamers requiring minimal salaries and obligatory advantages as a part of participant contracts. As a league, we additionally needed our merchandise to be aggressive, so we fastidiously designed and carried out the Aggressive Steadiness Tax.
“We now have all the time believed, and nonetheless imagine, that the Aggressive Steadiness Tax was lawful, and it didn’t have an antagonistic affect on participant salaries. The tax was by no means levied, and the leagues voluntarily dropped it from our guidelines in 2021. We stay dedicated to a participant ecosystem with truthful pay and healthcare and proceed to have the least restrictive participant mobility compensation system throughout the entire main sports activities leagues.”
The DOJ’s investigation into the Overwatch League’s wage cap truly started in July 2021 (opens in new tab), however negotiations to settle the matter broke down in late 2022, in keeping with the Jacob Wolf Report (opens in new tab). However with Microsoft’s proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard steaming towards its conclusion—and looking out more and more more likely to succeed—it is potential the corporate was rising wanting to clear the slate and take away any potential roadblocks.
Assuming the settlement is permitted by the court docket, this may mark Activision Blizzard’s second settlement with a US authorities regulatory physique this yr. In February, it agreed to pay a $35 million high quality (opens in new tab) to settle fees that it violated guidelines defending whistleblowers and didn’t correctly disclose info to buyers.