Apple Imaginative and prescient Professional AR/VR headset has launched because the breakthrough product within the spatial computing sphere. It carries head-turning specs and an eye-watering worth of $3,499. In the meantime, Meta Quest 3 is a extra modest providing at $499. In order that worth distinction apart, right here’s a Imaginative and prescient Professional vs Quest 3 comparability to discern which of the 2 headsets makes extra sense for you, no less than on paper.
1. Use circumstances and pitch
Imaginative and prescient Professional is a first-gen product that’s packed to the brim with cutting-edge applied sciences however solely a small portion of the presentation was devoted to gaming. Apple notes greater than 100 Apple Arcade Video games will probably be supported by its headset. In the meantime, Meta boasts Quest 3 could have the world’s greatest library of immersive experiences on day one. Quest 3 will probably be suitable with its predecessor’s 500+ titles.
Apple primarily pitches the Imaginative and prescient Professional as a spatial laptop centred round productiveness and content material consumption.
Even the truth that Apple permits Imaginative and prescient Professional controls via fingers, eyes, and voice; not by a controller reveals the dedication to gaming.
2. Construct
Apple Imaginative and prescient Professional is made from a customized aluminium alloy body and a “singular piece of three-dimensionally fashioned and laminated glass”. A few of the parts like the sunshine seal and headband have gotten delicate textile end. Quest 3 is plastic-made.
Each help swappable and size-adjustable headbands.
3. Audiovisuals
The Apple headset sports activities 1.41-inch micro-OLED panels on each side with a customized 3-element lens, 23 million pixels, and 4K decision.
Then again, the Quest 3 reportedly has a single LCD panel with 2,064 by 2,208 pixels per eye.
The rumoured brightness on the Quest 3 can be means lower than what the Apple Imaginative and prescient Professional’s leaked nits recommend.
On the audio aspect, the Imaginative and prescient Professional has twin drivers with spatial audio and position-based audio ray tracing. In its press launch, Meta additionally notes some type of the spatial understanding functionality of Quest 3, nevertheless, we aren’t positive what it means by that.
4. Prescription lenses
If it is advisable put on prescription glasses whereas sporting the headset, you’ll have to resort to a glasses spacer within the field for sporting glasses. It’s a must to take away the facial interface movie and connect the spacer after which match again the movie. Within the case of the Apple headset, you get Zeiss Optical Inserts as an alternative for visible correction.
5. Efficiency
Meta has geared up the Quest 3 with a Snapdragon CPU+GPU (presumably Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 chip). This can be a pretty highly effective chip however we don’t assume it may well stand towards the M2 SoC inside Apple Imaginative and prescient Professional. Apple has additionally stowed in a devoted R1 co-processor for managing the sensors.
The R1 has to handle 12 cameras, 5 sensors, and 6 microphones. Whereas the Quest 3 comes with two color cameras, two monochrome cameras for head and hand monitoring, and a depth sensor.
The software program on board is Imaginative and prescient OS (and the brand new app retailer) on the Imaginative and prescient Professional headset while it’s Android 13 on the Quest.
Apple claims the Imaginative and prescient Professional headset can final 2 days on its exterior battery pack that you need to carry round in your pocket or backpack. It’s related through a cable. Let’s see if Meta offers an inside battery when it formally particulars the specs.
Not earlier than lengthy, we should always have extra knowledge on each gadgets and subsequently have the ability to perceive how they really differ.